Monthly Archive for November, 2005

canada, you’ve got an election coming

The non-confidence vote against the Liberals has passed 171-133. Canadians will be voting circa January 23. (Globe and Mail story, Toronto Star, CBC)

For the uninitiated: In June of last year, the Liberal Party of Canada went from a majority government to a minority government, not long after ex-Prime Minister Jean Chrétien stepped down. They’re now under Paul Martin. For the last several months, the Chrétien government (under most of which Martin was Finance Minister) was under investigation for a sponsorship scandal, accused of doling out illegal funds to various Liberal campaigns during the late 1990s. At the end of the investigation–known as the Gomery Inquiry or Commission–all the blame was put on Chrétien, while Martin had no blame placed on him. On US Thanksgiving Day, Conservative Party leader Stephen Harper introduced the non-confidence motion, with support from the New Democrats and the Bloc Quebecois (the Bloc website is in French).

This marks the only time a Canadian government has fallen due to a non-confidence vote. Wikipedia already has an election section going.

Boris Johnson MP: Bush and Al-Jazeera

Boris Johnson MP: Bush and Al-Jazeera

Boris Johnson is a British Conservative MP, coming out against the British Attorney General for saying that anyone who releases documents pertaining to GWB expressing interest in blowing up Al-Jazeera will be jailed. This MP also states outright that if he receives any evidence (i.e., memos) he will see that they are published, risking jailtime for doing so.

But if there is an ounce of truth in the notion that George Bush seriously proposed the destruction of al-Jazeera, and was only dissuaded by the Prime Minister, then we need to know, and we need to know urgently. We need to know what we have been fighting for, and there is only one way to find out.

The Attorney General’s ban is ridiculous, untenable, and redolent of guilt. I do not like people to break the Official Secrets Act, and, as it happens, I would not object to the continued prosecution of those who are alleged to have broken it. But we now have allegations of such severity, against the US President and his motives, that we need to clear them up.

If someone passes me the document within the next few days I will be very happy to publish it in The Spectator, and risk a jail sentence. The public need to judge for themselves. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. If we suppress the truth, we forget what we are fighting for, and in an important respect we become as sick and as bad as our enemies.

demiurgiclust(dot)net :: version 16

New layout!

NHL + drugs = not a good thing

One-third of NHL players may use drugs.

Personally? I don’t know if there’s a problem or not. Regardless, I don’t think there’s anything anyone can do to stop “doping” in any sport. Of course, I’d dare say most people would rather it didn’t happen (I certainly don’t!); but still. I just don’t see this going away.

Meanwhile, the Leafs are having a major up-and-down season (12-8-2 at the moment…go figure?); and coach Pat Quinn is pissed. Last night they got smacked down by Boston 5-1. They’re about to play six more games in nine days, starting with one at Carolina on Friday night. Saturday, they play their arch-rivals, the Habs (Canadiens)…again. Of course that’ll be a good one. Anytime they play the Habs, it seems to be a good one.

But then this happens virtually every freakin’ season. The Leafs seem to be up the creek; and then, when it counts, they manage to slide into the playoffs–where, of course, by the East Division final, they go downhill again. ;) But on the other hand, if the Red Sox and White Sox could reverse their long-time “curses”, the Leafs can lift their almost-forty-years-without-the-Cup draught, too.

Yes, I’m optimistic. *nod*

okay, this is really twisted…

Bush Talked of Bombing Al-Jazeera

The Daily Mirror reported that Bush spoke of targeting Al-Jazeera’s headquarters in Doha, Qatar, when he met Blair at the White House on April 16, 2004. The Bush administration has regularly accused Al-Jazeera of being nothing more than a mouthpiece for anti-American sentiments.

The Daily Mirror attributed its information to unidentified sources. One source, said to be in the government, was quoted as saying that the alleged threat was “humorous, not serious,” but the newspaper quoted another source as saying that “Bush was deadly serious, as was Blair.”

Here’s the article from The Daily Mirror. Yes, it’s the same rag that had the infamous cover after last year’s election reading, “How could 58 million people be so dumb?”

The attack would have led to a massacre of innocents on the territory of a key ally, enraged the Middle East and almost certainly have sparked bloody retaliation.

Well, duh! It’s, for all intents and purposes, what’s been going on in Iraq for almost three years! It’s why there are nearly 30,000 dead civilians!

The following quotes are from a piece on the ABC (US) News website…

A Government official suggested that the Bush threat had been “humorous, not serious”.

But another source declared: “Bush was deadly serious, as was Blair. That much is absolutely clear from the language used by both men.”

Let me put it like this: It’s one thing when a columnist like Ann Coulter suggests Timothy McVeigh should’ve blown up the New York Times building. It’s another thing when the so-called “leader of the free world” suggests blowing up the Al-Jazeera building.

“I think they ought to clarify what exactly happened on this occasion,” he said. “If it was the case that President Bush wanted to bomb Al-Jazeera in what is after all a friendly country, it speaks volumes and it raises questions about subsequent attacks that took place on the press that wasn’t embedded with coalition forces,” the newspaper quoted Kilfoyle as saying.

Sir Menzies Campbell, foreign affairs spokesman for the opposition Liberal Democrats, said Tuesday that, if true, the memo was worrying.

“If true, then this underlines the desperation of the Bush administration as events in Iraq began to spiral out of control,” he said. “On this occasion, the prime minister may have been successful in averting political disaster, but it shows how dangerous his relationship with President Bush has been.”

Lord knows there’s been some scrutiny surrounding Tony Blair’s relationship with GWB. Heck, I’ve been somewhat critical of it myself. For a while, it definitely looked like Blair was like GWB’s little poodle, especially in regards to Iraq. Whether or not he’ll see to having the full memo published is yet to be seen. If it is published, I think it’ll be even more damning than the one that was published back in May of this year.