minneapolis bridge collapse preventable?

Problems with the I-35W bridge were uncovered in 1990.

In 1990, the federal government gave the I-35W bridge a rating of “structurally deficient,” citing significant corrosion in its bearings. The bridge is one of 77,000 bridges in that category nationwide, 1,160 in Minnesota alone.

The designation means some portions of the bridge needed to be scheduled for repair or replacement, and it was on a schedule for inspection every two years.

Dorgan said the bearings could not have been repaired without jacking up the entire deck of the bridge. Because the bearings were not sliding, inspectors concluded the corrosion was not a major issue.

During the 1990s, later inspections found fatigue cracks and corrosion in the steel around the bridge’s joints. Those problems were repaired. Starting in 1993, the state said, the bridge was inspected annually instead of every other year.

A 2005 federal inspection also rated the bridge structurally deficient, giving it a 50 on scale of 100 for structural stability.

White House press secretary Tony Snow said while the inspection didn’t indicate the bridge was at risk of failing, “If an inspection report identifies deficiencies, the state is responsible for taking corrective actions.”

For once, I do agree with Tony Snow. In my opinion, if there is a problem with the infrastructure, it ought to be fixed as soon as possible, if not right away.

Federal officials alerted states to immediately inspect all bridges similar to the one that collapsed.

The eight-lane Interstate 35W bridge was Minnesota’s busiest bridge, carrying 141,000 vehicles a day. It was in the midst of mostly repaving repairs when it buckled during the evening rush hour. Dozens of cars plummeted more than 60 feet into the Mississippi River, some falling on top one of another. A school bus sat on the angled concrete.

Engineers wondered whether heavy traffic might have contributed to the collapse. Studies of the bridge have raised concern about cracks caused by metal fatigue.

Ding! Heavy traffic would definitely be a culprit. I mean, it’s an Interstate bridge, which I’d think is used all the time, especially since it’s in a major city. It seems to me that those bridges that are used the most should be the ones that ought to be in the front of the line for major repairs every so often. I hope they’ve learned a valuable lesson.

Meanwhile, condolence to those who’ve lost family members on the bridge. May they all rest in peace.

2 Responses to “minneapolis bridge collapse preventable?”


  1. 1 Kevin

    Scary that this was one of the “good” structurally deficient bridges. But, hey, at least we have money to destroy and rebuild Iraq.

  2. 2 Shelly

    LOL, really.

Comments are currently closed.